My Journey

I have made all the calculations; fate will do the rest -(Napoleon)

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

France eats the 'Apple'


After Adam and Eve, it is the turn of French government to eat the forbidden fruit, and that too a huge bite. In the series of never ending controversial news emanating from France, this time it is French government versus the online music sellers. The lower house of French legislature Assemblé National has passed a bill requiring sellers of digital music players and online music to become interoperable. This simply means music brought from any store can be played in any digital music player, bypassing the whole concept of DRM (digital rights management). At present the music brought from stores of Apple, Microsoft, Sony etc can be played only in their own digital players. This move will hurt all the players in the industry but Apple being leader of the pack is miffed most. It has sold 1 billion propreitary itune music from its online store and 42 million ipods, which is considered the next best thing after bread and butter to happen in the music industry.

According to the bill, it is wrong, for example, the music bought from itunes store to play only in the ipod. Apple has denounced the move calling it as ‘state sponsored piracy’ and vibes from US governments seems to be supporting Apple. The fact is, after burning the music bought from itunes, it can be changed in any format and also ipod does not play only the music from itunes store. So what was the need for this bill ? France says it wants to stop monopoly in online music industry.

Customers at first might, find it a welcome move but it is not. The music industry is still nascent and trying to stabilise after years of piracy, illegal download and sharing. A mature music market will always be in favour of customers which could be wiped out due to this bill. It has been time and again proved that compeition in free market is the only thing which favours customers. The threat is not only from France but from other countries replicating the French move. Already in Denmark the government is petitioned by local music sellers to introduce a similar bill.

It is yet to see how Apple reacts if the bill is passed by French senate and made a law. It might take off its itune store from France. It does not make as much money from itune music as from ipod so this should be a worthy decision to operate in France under the new law. The other reason for making this move could be the fact that if in some way the music of itune is made interoperable in France this could be done in any other country. No one can stop a software to run in other places on internet. Shutting the shop in one country makes sense than losing the whole business.

Is this latest move of French government confusing? To some it might seem so. On the one hand it is trying to create an open competition in the music industry and on the other hand it is blocking Italian company to buy the French energy firm or Netherlands based Mittal steel company to buy Arcelor. What it is for? Protectionism or free market? On a little deeper analysis the picture is crystal clear. Anything is okay for France as long as it is in its favour. The only thing which works in France is nationalism.

35 Comments:

  • At 1:52 PM, Blogger Raj said…

    I don't see anything wrong with the french govt.'s move.

    When u buy a CD, you expect it to work on all music systems. Similarly, if you buy a song, you should be able to listen to it on any player.

     
  • At 4:02 PM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Raj - I think you misinterpreted. You are free to buy CD and play it anywhere but this is for the songs sold 'only' on the itunes store or like wise for Microsoft or Sony. You can still buy the albums and listen. The itune thing is the competitive technology of Apple and France wants that to go.

     
  • At 4:57 PM, Blogger Raj said…

    No, I didnt misinterpet anything.

    Itunes is a store. Buying music from them is like buying music from a particular store. No matter what technology they might use to sell songs (which is no secret given that there are 100s of such stores now), once you buy a song, its yours. And you must be able to play it wherever you want.

     
  • At 5:20 PM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Raj - That's true, itunes is a store. So if you don't want a music tied with a player you can buy from other stores. But people buy from itunes cause it has an edge and that comes from research & development of Apple. That being its competitive technology. Anyway it is not preventing other music to play in ipod.

    There seems to be no logical reason with the French government for this move. Even today you can buy from itune, burn it in a cd and then change the format.

    The concern with this law is that this will lead to piracy and illegal download, ultimately killing the whole industry.

    There has to be some merit and not a move just to support domestic industry. Protectionism should have some limit. At this rate France will go ahead and try to make the razor blades iterusable as well !

     
  • At 7:34 PM, Blogger XVSA013 said…

    its has become fashionable for ppl to disagree with French Govt.

    ---

    I want anything I buy to play on any platform I want. Why are the companies controlling it?

    I bought music not their shares.

    I dont understand how you are saying this will lead to piracy !!! one can still download illegal iTune and play it on iPod.

    every industry has to adopt Industry wide standards ... competitive technology is not an acceptable arguement !! ... what if someone says Sony CD shd play only in Sony players !!!

     
  • At 7:51 PM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Mowgli - haha that was good one, It has become fashionable to disagree with French government. Have to blame the whole world !

    No one is controlling anything. You go and buy music and play no problem. But if you buy from itune then play it on ipod cause thats the way to control the piracy and illegal sharing.

    When it is free from DRM then you can download and make as many copies as you can and then share it thereby leading to piracy and illegal sharing. itune will cease to be financially teneable and will collapse. Would that be a good thing.

    Let the market decide if there is better alternative, then itunes will perish. Why this law to protect the domestic players? If you cant compete then kill the industry? this is what this new law simply wants to achieve.

    France is the most protected economy of the developed world and this ain't something to be proud of.

    YOu know if industry wide standards are there or some standard technology then it becomes opposite to what you are saying. Why everything has to be based on certain standard and what if that standard has to be licensed ?

    Let the market decide, let there be free market.

    P.S - I love France, it has so many good things.

     
  • At 8:10 PM, Blogger XVSA013 said…

    so u agree that French law is correct !! good for you.

    ps: i know exactly what u like abt the french. :p

     
  • At 8:19 PM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Mowgli - You know what things ? Good :D

    hey where did I say that I agree with French law ?

     
  • At 8:36 PM, Blogger XVSA013 said…

    hey look how Chirac screws them:

    "At one U.N. summit where there was no [French] translation, President Chirac pretended not to understand questions in English and demanded that Tony Blair, who speaks French, act as his interpreter," The Times recalled.

    On another occasion, President Chirac insisted on speaking to U.S. President George W. Bush in French forcing the latter to call for an interpreter. This despite the fact that the French leader is said to speak English fluently, having lived in America as a young man.

    http://www.hindu.com/2006/03/27/stories/2006032706611100.htm

     
  • At 8:52 PM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Mowgli - Yeah same thing happened in the recent EU summit.

    This is what I said , the only thing which works in France is 'nationalism'

     
  • At 10:46 PM, Blogger XVSA013 said…

    now you are accusing French of being nationalistic??

    man, come out of it.

     
  • At 11:50 PM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Mowgli - No man I am not accusing but then explain what's happening. Okay you want level field and fair competition but you block Italian Enel to buy out Suez the French water and enery firm. What is this then tell me ?

    One day you cry hoarse over free market and next day do everything to block the very free market.

    You tell me Mowgli ?

     
  • At 5:43 AM, Blogger XVSA013 said…

    suez is just one eg, even mittal deal there ... but see France has always been an slow outsider ... when everyone stopped they exploded 5 bombs ... britain withdrew from all over the world ... but french were in denial and were acting smart in veitnam till they were kicked out ... in '56.

    the French arent very vocal abt all of u open up all ur market!! the US and UK are bigger hypocrites than the French ... do u remember 2 yrs ago the US slapped 3% import duties on steel imports leaving Indian exports unviable ... now tell me u US/italy(sonia) lover.

    US has refused to reduce its farm subsidies ... so have the French. what u talking man??

    i know why .. u have taken ur quota of the French wine when you are writing all this ... :p

     
  • At 8:21 AM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Mowgli - You have got royally confused or trying to say something else but can't say it directly. The Geopolitical facts are correct but you are not thinking in simple manner.

    No one asks France to open up the market or to reduce the subsidy or to protect the economy. Fine, no problem but then ask Apple to removed DRM. That's also a protection.

    Now think in this term not the Geopolitics of India wrt to France, US and Italy. And if you think anyone who opposes US will side with France then you yourself know how correct you would be.

     
  • At 9:02 AM, Blogger XVSA013 said…

    for any meaningful analysis u need to know why French act the way they do ...

    the issue is abt protectionist tendencies of the french ...

    reading last issue of Economist alone is not enuf ... you know what i mean :-)

     
  • At 9:13 AM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Mowgli - This debate has lost the direction it seems.

    Does it requires any analysis to find out nationalistic policies is going to benefit which country ?

    For the past 5 comments I am asking a simple question what France wants to follow Protected economy or Free economy? It does not change anything why France is going to do this or do that. Whether France is taking it out on US by doing this or that hardly changes the fact.

    I don't see everything with respect to Indo-US relationship. That will be paranoia.

    To some France might seem to be the biggest inspiration of free market by taking it out on Apple but it is the biggest anti-thesis of it in the current world.

    So you make your view from Economist and thats why you are lost since Economist didn't do the post on Apple issue.

    And it also seems you have some direct talks with French government thats why you get more than what Economist says,you know what I mean :)

     
  • At 10:19 AM, Blogger XVSA013 said…

    no not the French Govt ... but few other magazines also ... now u know what i mean :D

    i dont know where u get Indo-US ideas here ...

     
  • At 11:20 AM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Mowgli - Well you brought US in our this discussion. Well there can be many countries which are protectionist but that can't be used to justify it.

    France is one of the most protected economy and yet is giving lessons to Online Music industry to become fair and open. What consistency....

     
  • At 12:19 PM, Blogger XVSA013 said…

    yeah so they are changing ...

    yaaawn

     
  • At 12:39 PM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Mowgli - This is what I was saying. On a first look it might think they are changing but they are not. France was the country which favoured Mac most and ripped apart Microsoft but now the same Apple when has assumed threatening proportion to its domestic music industry it has fallen out of favour.

    Why does not France makes its record straight and accept what they are upto?

     
  • At 4:12 PM, Blogger XVSA013 said…

    i think this law is a correct law.

     
  • At 4:16 PM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Mowgli - I have given reasons in my post as to why I don't think this bill/law is a good idea.

     
  • At 6:40 PM, Blogger killer is i said…

    well .. first of all, i guess french govt is right THIS TIME coz even i believe that if u buy music, then its yrs, u can play it on anything u want. I can't talk much on these political things coz my civics is really WEAK :D .
    Comment thing was like chatting between satya and mowgli :p
    And satya bro, wat r u ? a journlist or something ???

     
  • At 7:32 PM, Blogger XVSA013 said…

    yeah i got ur logic ... ur logic is they do something what u deem (and american media (perhaps because of that)) wrong ... so whatever they have done is also wrong ...

    twisted ... but i got it.

     
  • At 11:06 AM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Killer - This is what I said - at first it might seem the move is good for customers and might also increase the sales of itunes but a deeper analysis ramifications become clear.

    Me and journalist - no I am not so I guess I will be the other option 'something'

    Mowgli - So now you understand where does America comes from. I really could not make out what exactly is your point from the various comments.

    You agree France follows nationalism and I said that. You mean to say that nationalism is good I agree but it is good ONLY for that country.

    Secondly, what I feel is that protected economy is good for no country including the country which does it. Simply cause France was always like this, does not justify it.

    Thirdly, everything Anti American is not pro Indian. Let there be a showdown between India and US and then see which side France stands.

     
  • At 8:33 PM, Blogger XVSA013 said…

    Thirdly, everything Anti American is not pro Indian. Let there be a showdown between India and US and then see which side France stands.


    where the hell did this come from??? crap

    --

    i meant americans are protective too ... as usual u hav ... :p

     
  • At 12:03 AM, Blogger greensatya said…

    This crap came from what you wrote. I didn't bring America into this discussion.

    As usual your logic is if America is doing it so it is justifiable for France. Hell, I didn't even bring America's protection policy in my post and I don't think if everyone else is doing something 'wrong' then the 'wrong' can be justified.

    Some people have filters to see everything from American angle and this is what I am saying since your comment no 1. Not all but many people do it, let there be any issue, - the justification will be 'that even the previous regime was doing so..'.so is it justified ?

    This American angle would have been come in picture if I had said the protective policies of America is good.

    But this is typical you and as usual you have..... :p

     
  • At 8:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    well i think it's wrong on the French govt's part.

     
  • At 8:36 PM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Harry> - Thanks, me too, atleast someone is getting the point :)

     
  • At 7:36 AM, Blogger Raj said…

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

     
  • At 8:06 AM, Blogger Raj said…

    //atleast someone is getting the point

    What does that mean?

    If some people don't agree with you, they don't get the point??

    PS: Had to delete the previous comment due to a big typo :)

     
  • At 8:14 AM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Raj - I can understand what you are saying. At first my reply seems exactly to what you have written. No, I don't mean that if someone does not agree with me, they don't get the point. This is not what I meant.

    What I implied was that people totally skipped the part of my post where I did mention how at first this might seem to be customer friendly policy but actually it is not. No one actually brought this issue in the debate.

    I have always welcomed alternative views and opinions.

    Hope this clears the confusion or my politically incorrect reply.

     
  • At 2:53 PM, Blogger Y said…

    //What I implied was that people totally skipped the part of my post where I did mention how at first this might seem to be customer friendly policy but actually it is not. No one actually brought this issue in the debate

    -How could you infer that Harry had this in mind ;)

    This seems to be a comment written by a Satya cought in the wrong foot! Is that the satya, Satya??

    And Killer,

    //And satya bro, wat r u ? a journalist or something ??? //

    Hahahahahaha

     
  • At 10:53 AM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Sher - Let me first of all apologise for delay in replying to this comment.

    In the post I did mention that at first glance it seems that this policy of French government is customer friendly but on analysis it is not. But people didn't agree to it and so I thought they didnt get the point I was making.

    Harry did agree to me so I thought he got the point. Now Harry might or might not have read it but as you know

    "perception is reality"

     
  • At 12:53 PM, Blogger Y said…

    Thanks Satya for the comment. I thought you were in the mood to let the water flow under the bridge. he he.
    Or as you always write 'I smell rat'..I smelt something similar ;>>

    Ok I think you have a fair point.So, objection overruled.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home