My Journey

I have made all the calculations; fate will do the rest -(Napoleon)

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Main Street or Wall Street ?


Almost a day later, things are looking a bit better. The angst and frustrations are bit modified on seeing the ‘greens’. None the less it was unbelievable – a deal which took a week to be accepted by two political parties fell by 12 votes! I can’t seem to understand who stood defeated, the political managers or the bill?

The worst outcome of the whole process is the debate on Main Street and Wall Street. There can’t be an inopportune time to discuss this topic than at this juncture. Why is it a problem of Wall Street? Does not the main street lead to Wall Street or may be Wall Street is on an island?

I agree firms and associated eco-system took a little more than necessary risk, there were maybe little less regulation, lure of lucre, but did these lead to the fall? Let me try to put this in simplest way possible. The Wall Street went down because they had too much confidence on Main Street. After using all of the Financial Engineering, they carved out, bundled few other assortments and created instruments called Credit Default Swaps(CDS). Guess what, these CDS are derivatives, which inherently mean they derive their value from underlying asset, and in this case the asset was those mortgages. Those mortgages, which people from Main Street took, without giving a damn, because they were cheap! Yes, because they were cheap and the government had totally incentivized the whole borrowing process. The CDS went bust because those living on Main Street didn’t pay back their mortgages. Consider an analogy. If all of us have car accidents and the insurance company goes bust, then we will blame insurance company for taking risk. But remember the insurance company is dependent on a fact that not all of us will have car accidents.

Further, this whole thing is not about Wall Street and Main Street. If our neighbor’s big house, which we envied when they bought, faces foreclosure then this whole phenomenon, is also bringing down the price of our own house as well. The credit crisis not only hurt Bear Sterns, or Merrill Lynch but is also hurting the small mom and pop stores. It not only brings down the stock price of Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers, but also the value of Microsoft shares, in which many of us have invested for our retirement.

Let’s not make the whole thing trivial by putting this as Wall Street problem or end of capitalism or win for Socialism or vindication of Asian economies. There is a serious problem and everyone should work towards addressing the situation. Admittedly, there have been mistakes, not enough regulations, too many incentives for cheap loans, etc. Let’s debate about how to improve things and invigorate the economy once again.

Labels: , ,

6 Comments:

  • At 5:16 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Yeah lets. Which does not include using 700 Billion Dollars of tax payers money.

    Why are profits a capitalist phenomenon and losses a socialist phenomenon.

     
  • At 8:28 AM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Det-Res - the answer to your question is the blog post itself. Tax payers need to lend now, cause they didn't pay when they were supposed to pay, they need loans today/tomorrow,and they need to keep their investment safe.
    Losses are socialist phenomenon cause no one wants to have loss. Let the firms go bust and let people not have money to buy their daily bread - now whose problem it is? that's why it is socialism !!

     
  • At 7:56 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Please improve your English:

    //There can’t be any inopportune time to discuss the any topic than this at this juncture//

    //The worst outcome of the whole process is the debate of Main Street and Wall Street.// ''debate on''

    //I agree firms and their people took a little more than necessary risks, there were, maybe, little less regulation, a haste of making fast money, but does these lead to the fall? // ''its people'', also check the flow of the sentence; usage of 'does' is incorrect. Instead it should be 'do'; if you use 'a' before little more, then end the phrase with risk not risks;

    //They carved out, put all sorts of financial engineering learnt in the classes, may be a bit more from here and there and created instruments – Credit Default Swaps(CDS)// (correct the sentence)

    //Guess what, these CDS are derivatives – which by it mean they derive the value from something else, and in this case the something else was those mortgages// 'which by it' should be which by itself and rephrase the sentence

    //If all of us have car accidents and the insurance company goes bust, then we will blame insurance company for taking risk but remember the insurance company was there for us, not ‘only’ for itself// rephrase

    //Secondly, this whole thing is not about Wall Street and main street cause if the neighbor’s big house, which we envied when they bought faces foreclosure, then this whole phenomenon, is also bringing down the price of our own house as well// use commas correctly

    //The credit crisis did not only hurt Bear Sterns, or Merrill Lynch but also hurting the small mom and pop stores// please rephrase properly

    //Let’s not make the whole thing trivial by putting this as Wall Street problem or end of capitalism or win of Socialism or vindication of Asian economies.// win 'for'

    //Admittedly, there have been mistakes, lack or rather no regulations, too many incentives for cheap loans, etc// 'lack of' insert of


    There are more mistakes, but for the time being, please work on correcting the mistakes mentioned above. Thank You

     
  • At 2:11 PM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Anonymous - Thanks ! I know it must have bothered you that I didn't do anything on your comment. I was busy and this is not an excuse.

    Accept my gratitude for the proofreading and letting me improve my English a little more.

    Keep up the comments..
    cheers

     
  • At 7:15 AM, Blogger Abhinav said…

    I think regulation will help :)

    Performance review of top management will go a long way :P

     
  • At 6:56 PM, Blogger greensatya said…

    Abhinav - Yeah, regulations would help.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home