Planning and Execution
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Planning and Execution are both quite important aspect, one decides what has to be done and other translates it into reality. Which is more important? It is difficult to choose one, because they so totally complement each other. But my personal view is that ‘execution’ is more demanding, more adventurous and thrilling. There is nothing more delightful than to execute a plan to its expected result. There is nothing more satisfying than to think of every minute detail, find out alternatives, do an analysis of the options and then go for it. There is nothing more interesting than to read the details of a well executed plan.
The only reason I am fan of John Grisham is because of this, the meticulous details of execution in each of his books are so interesting that one will be compelled to finish the entire book in one go. His books like “The Firm” or “The Partner” has stories of flawlessly executed plans which spans across continents and different agencies like banks, intelligence agents, politicians etc. The way Grisham describes every little intricate details and the finesse with which the protagonist moves about achieving the plans is awesome.
The movie “Black Hawk Down” is about UN army operation in Mogadishu, involving American forces and fighters loyal to Mohamed Farrah Aidid. The operation was not successful and 18 American soldiers lost their lives. I don’t know whether the actual happening was same as shown in the movie, but it showed Major General William Garrison controlling the entire operation from the base camp, with images beamed right to several monitors in his tent. No job in this world could be better than to get an opportunity to execute an operation that way. The operation failed, and my view is that execution failed because risk management was not done. The plan was optimistic rather than being realistic. Whatever, the movie is worth watching again and again.
I have found many people, who are adept in making strategies, developing plans, analyzing scenarios but they fail when it comes to execution and it puts paid to all the earlier efforts. Well, obviously there would be excuses but the real reason is lack of sincerity. The failures are not due to poor planning but failing to execute some of the steps which might seem small but have an important bearing on the result. More often it is also due to lack of evaluation of all the possible worst cases that might happen. The plans draped in ‘folie de grandeur’ are useless unless it has resolutions for those worst cases.
Take a simple example, tomorrow I need to catch an early morning flight to Paris. The plan is to get up in the morning, reach the bus station and take the bus to airport and check in. Now the plan should also include that what if there is no bus tomorrow, what if the bus is late? If there is no bus then what is the next option? If the option is to take taxi, then is there a possibility of getting taxi that early in morning in the bus station? Yes it is possible but what if there is no taxi at the bus station? The next step then would be to call the central taxi number and ask for one taxi to pick you and that would require having that central taxi station number. Just the failure to have the taxi station number can wreck the whole plan in the worst case. Look around for any example where execution has failed; most of the failures would be due to lack of sincerity and for evading simple details. It is always okay to be the devil’s advocate when you have to plan and execute.
It speaks volumes about a person who can flawlessly execute a plan, be it a simple plan. They are the real achievers and not those who can only make grand strategies; I respect, admire and appreciate them immensely.
Planning and Execution are both quite important aspect, one decides what has to be done and other translates it into reality. Which is more important? It is difficult to choose one, because they so totally complement each other. But my personal view is that ‘execution’ is more demanding, more adventurous and thrilling. There is nothing more delightful than to execute a plan to its expected result. There is nothing more satisfying than to think of every minute detail, find out alternatives, do an analysis of the options and then go for it. There is nothing more interesting than to read the details of a well executed plan.
The only reason I am fan of John Grisham is because of this, the meticulous details of execution in each of his books are so interesting that one will be compelled to finish the entire book in one go. His books like “The Firm” or “The Partner” has stories of flawlessly executed plans which spans across continents and different agencies like banks, intelligence agents, politicians etc. The way Grisham describes every little intricate details and the finesse with which the protagonist moves about achieving the plans is awesome.
The movie “Black Hawk Down” is about UN army operation in Mogadishu, involving American forces and fighters loyal to Mohamed Farrah Aidid. The operation was not successful and 18 American soldiers lost their lives. I don’t know whether the actual happening was same as shown in the movie, but it showed Major General William Garrison controlling the entire operation from the base camp, with images beamed right to several monitors in his tent. No job in this world could be better than to get an opportunity to execute an operation that way. The operation failed, and my view is that execution failed because risk management was not done. The plan was optimistic rather than being realistic. Whatever, the movie is worth watching again and again.
I have found many people, who are adept in making strategies, developing plans, analyzing scenarios but they fail when it comes to execution and it puts paid to all the earlier efforts. Well, obviously there would be excuses but the real reason is lack of sincerity. The failures are not due to poor planning but failing to execute some of the steps which might seem small but have an important bearing on the result. More often it is also due to lack of evaluation of all the possible worst cases that might happen. The plans draped in ‘folie de grandeur’ are useless unless it has resolutions for those worst cases.
Take a simple example, tomorrow I need to catch an early morning flight to Paris. The plan is to get up in the morning, reach the bus station and take the bus to airport and check in. Now the plan should also include that what if there is no bus tomorrow, what if the bus is late? If there is no bus then what is the next option? If the option is to take taxi, then is there a possibility of getting taxi that early in morning in the bus station? Yes it is possible but what if there is no taxi at the bus station? The next step then would be to call the central taxi number and ask for one taxi to pick you and that would require having that central taxi station number. Just the failure to have the taxi station number can wreck the whole plan in the worst case. Look around for any example where execution has failed; most of the failures would be due to lack of sincerity and for evading simple details. It is always okay to be the devil’s advocate when you have to plan and execute.
It speaks volumes about a person who can flawlessly execute a plan, be it a simple plan. They are the real achievers and not those who can only make grand strategies; I respect, admire and appreciate them immensely.
11 Comments:
At 6:11 AM, Y said…
Have you been reading edward de bono lately? But I concur with you on every point and also that Black Hawk Down should be watched again.
Was just reading a special issue of the economist yesterday. Where they pointed that GW Bush was one of the grandest american presidents in terms of ambition but poorest in terms of execution and therein lies his misery.
At 1:57 PM, greensatya said…
Nah,I don't have patience to read those motivational and self-help books.
I wrote this post afer I read about the entire operation of Indian authorities in bringing the notorious gangster Abu Salem to India, after he was extradited from Portugal.
Normally Indian authorities are not good at these things, but this execution was impeccable. They didnt use any commercial flight cause all commercial flight have a stopover at Frankfurt which would have required a transit visa for Salem and his lawyers would have done something to get him arrested there and again 3 years of extradition process. So they got a chartered Gulfstream plane of RAW and they didnt not even want to fly over European airspace, so that if something happens and they have to make an emergerncy landing, they won't land in Europe for its lengthy and complicated extradition process.
The plane left Portugal, touched Atlantic sea, then turned to Mediterranean sea and crossed over Egypt and reached India. Indian government had kept an air crew in Cairo on standby. Now this is called perfect execution, keeping in mind all the complications that could have occured.
This prompted me to write this blog.
What you say about GWB is true, even in India we had good leaders with great vision but no execution capabilities.
At 2:00 PM, greensatya said…
oops, that's Atlantic ocean..
At 6:44 AM, Y said…
I didnt know that. Thats good work.
Speaking of Indian leaders there are two I wud like to mention, Jawhar L Nehru and LB Shastri. Nehru I think had a romantic vision of the country. He laid great strategies. Obviously he faltered in execution. There is an answer I want to find here. Did these strategies failed because they were used for grand and romantic ideas or due to poor execution?
His immediate succesor, LBS, if you see was a good executionist. I read a good piece on how he collaborated with the bureaucracy in bringing abt the so called green revolution. Ofcourse he is blamed for the Indo- Pak war and subsequent Tashkent agreement but there also I feel he did pretty good given the circumstances.
Even PV Narasimha, the way he approached in usherring the reforms, speaks of a competent man manager and executioner.
But I feel that they do well only when a sword hangs on their heads. Given the majority support PV had and that he himself had changed the conditions, if I look at an overall term basis, he performed extremely poorly.
At 11:27 AM, greensatya said…
Got busy this weekend so kinda late in replying to the comments,sorry.
Yogi - My personal view is that the worst ever PM that India had and will have is undoubtedly Nehru. Most of the India's problem today is because of him and his cowardice.I am too biased against him, but I think he hardly was capable of even strategizing, let alone execution.
I like the other two you mentioned; Shastri was the man of intergrity and had the courage of his conviction. I have a view on what happened in Tashkent and much blame lies to then Home minister Chavan and Soviet influence on India's policy making. But I think the winning point for India in 1965 war was openining of the western front, a decision taken by Shastri. Overall I agree with you and give high points to LBS.
PV was also good in putting our country on the path of reform and I would consider him a adept executioner, barring one or two 'run of the mill' political antics.
Vineet - I agree with you that planning and execution are both important and compliment each other. But you know your plan does not carry something like 'Work Break down structure', that's the job of one who executes,a planner is one who strategizes. Unless the execution is for an 'errand boy' in poker club, the plan will not contain all the minute details of execution.
I attach a slight bit of high importance to execution cause this is where strategy is translated into reality.
At 12:15 PM, Y said…
Hi, thanks a lot for your comments. Good to know that you r based out of Bangalore in India. Currently am here too. Whenever you are here, inform me, I will be a willing guide to all the automobile showrooms and will charge nothing for my services:> Lots of new SUVs are here now. Tata has launched a spruced up safari with a direct injection common rail diesel plant called DICOR. Tata cars are still looked at value for many offerings. Yes you do need heart to go in for Tata vehicles but I can tell you that they are the one company who are following the steepest trajectory enroute to becoming a quality player. I already think that Tata Indica at present is the best of all hatchbacks here and that includes its genetic cousin the Palio from Fiat.
Nehru..its a touchy issue. He was definitely wrong in many cases as exemplified by his words, 'go kick those bastards' at the start of the Chinese war, but then I also see some positives. They tend to be philosophical, and I still hesitate to say that they were a result of Nehru's foresight. Briefly, I think his mantra of self sufficiency does explain some part of the present success, though calling present times a success is a matter of much debate.
At 9:57 AM, greensatya said…
Thanks a lot Yogi for the offer. I will definitely get in touch with you and then we will discuss about Nehru, PV, etc....
:)
At 12:35 PM, Akanksha said…
i love grisham books too.. but now i think he is losing steam .. his latest books leav a lot to b desired...
but being a die hard grisham fan i always make it a pt to read all his novels...
At 1:34 PM, greensatya said…
Welcome Akanksha,
Yeah Grisham's core competence is legal thriller. But of late, it seems, he is trying to discover the complete writer in himself and this explains "Bleachers" and " The Last Juror". For his latest book " The Broker" he spent considerable time in Italy to do the research about Tuscany cuisine.
As you said, we being the die hard fans will read anything that comes from Grisham :)
At 3:15 PM, Freeze said…
i read almost the whole of yr blog. ok, i just saw thro the pages... but i dint find anything abt yr 'inspiration' frm cast away!
where is it?!??
oh.. i like john grisham too ;)
At 10:29 PM, greensatya said…
It was the second post on my blog. I have sent you the link.
Post a Comment
<< Home