Mittal Steel Bids For Arcelor - Why?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The New Year has not been particularly good for the board executives of Arcelor. Just days after wining the tough fight with ThyssenKrupp AG for buying out the Canadian steel maker Dofasco Inc, they are again huddling in their board room in less than 12 hours from now. This time the predator has been turned into prey.
The bid of Rotterdam based Mittal Steel has stunned everyone including Arcelor which has termed it as 'hostile'. Mittal Steel, controlled 88% by family of L N Mittal has offered to buy shares of Arcelor for Euros 18.6 billion in cash and shares. The steel industry has seen lot of mergers and consolidation in past few years, Arcelor itself being a result of the merger of steel companies of France, Luxembourg and Spain. But this bid has outshone all of them.
If successful, the combined entity will have total annual capacity of 115mn tones with the next biggest being Nippon Steel of Japan having capacity of 30mn tones. The hectic merger activity in steel industry started after Chinese demand lifted it from a multi-year slump. Since then, the insatiable Chinese hunger has seen soaring prices and profits increasing by 30 to 35 % for most of the companies. At its peak the benchmark hot rolled coil steel jumped from $200 per ton to $600 per ton which has since fallen to around $500.
But this Chinese demand is also supported by huge production from Chinese companies. The output of China in 2005 being 349mn tones, it is estimated that by 2010 Chinese total production will be much higher than its total demand. This would lead to glut coupled with possibility of a slump due to cyclical nature of steel market. This leads us to a question, why is Mittal Steel trying to snap Arcelor?
There are a few reasons. Though Chinese production capacity is increasing by leaps and bounds, it lacks good quality iron ore. It purchases most of the raw material from Brazil and Australia. In the merged company, by its sheer size, Mittal Steel will have greater bargaining power over suppliers who have increased their prices by 72% in recent times. This will give them an edge over Chinese producers of steel. Secondly, the steel industry has traditionally been a seller-driven market and Mittal would be able to restore it to that level so that they can tide over any slump. Thirdly, with economies of scale it could lower overall operating expenses and resist price hikes (Arcelor has a considerable mining presence)
The other reason could be that Arcelor and Mittal were competing with each other (Ukraine's state-owned Kryvorizhstal bid) in buying out other steel companies thereby increasing the price. This problem would be solved for Mittal with the takeover.
Chances are high for the takeover to go through as most of the share holders of Arcelor are institutions and they don't love individual companies. There could be a few hiccups like opposition from the French and Luxembourg governments. Mittal might also have to raise the price it is offering per share. Despite these hurdles, the merge will create an entity of considerable heft
The New Year has not been particularly good for the board executives of Arcelor. Just days after wining the tough fight with ThyssenKrupp AG for buying out the Canadian steel maker Dofasco Inc, they are again huddling in their board room in less than 12 hours from now. This time the predator has been turned into prey.
The bid of Rotterdam based Mittal Steel has stunned everyone including Arcelor which has termed it as 'hostile'. Mittal Steel, controlled 88% by family of L N Mittal has offered to buy shares of Arcelor for Euros 18.6 billion in cash and shares. The steel industry has seen lot of mergers and consolidation in past few years, Arcelor itself being a result of the merger of steel companies of France, Luxembourg and Spain. But this bid has outshone all of them.
If successful, the combined entity will have total annual capacity of 115mn tones with the next biggest being Nippon Steel of Japan having capacity of 30mn tones. The hectic merger activity in steel industry started after Chinese demand lifted it from a multi-year slump. Since then, the insatiable Chinese hunger has seen soaring prices and profits increasing by 30 to 35 % for most of the companies. At its peak the benchmark hot rolled coil steel jumped from $200 per ton to $600 per ton which has since fallen to around $500.
But this Chinese demand is also supported by huge production from Chinese companies. The output of China in 2005 being 349mn tones, it is estimated that by 2010 Chinese total production will be much higher than its total demand. This would lead to glut coupled with possibility of a slump due to cyclical nature of steel market. This leads us to a question, why is Mittal Steel trying to snap Arcelor?
There are a few reasons. Though Chinese production capacity is increasing by leaps and bounds, it lacks good quality iron ore. It purchases most of the raw material from Brazil and Australia. In the merged company, by its sheer size, Mittal Steel will have greater bargaining power over suppliers who have increased their prices by 72% in recent times. This will give them an edge over Chinese producers of steel. Secondly, the steel industry has traditionally been a seller-driven market and Mittal would be able to restore it to that level so that they can tide over any slump. Thirdly, with economies of scale it could lower overall operating expenses and resist price hikes (Arcelor has a considerable mining presence)
The other reason could be that Arcelor and Mittal were competing with each other (Ukraine's state-owned Kryvorizhstal bid) in buying out other steel companies thereby increasing the price. This problem would be solved for Mittal with the takeover.
Chances are high for the takeover to go through as most of the share holders of Arcelor are institutions and they don't love individual companies. There could be a few hiccups like opposition from the French and Luxembourg governments. Mittal might also have to raise the price it is offering per share. Despite these hurdles, the merge will create an entity of considerable heft
16 Comments:
At 12:33 PM, Raj said…
Interesting views.
Didnt know what else to say and something is betterthan nothing :)
At 1:15 PM, XVSA013 said…
good post satya ...
in long term he is working to build a steel cartel to insulte aganist the commodity cycles ... on the models of OPEC!!! even with this he will control only 10% of global production ... even that is unprecedented in steel history ... i am just happy its an indian who is driving all this ...
At 3:52 PM, Freeze said…
I too dont know what to say! i was never good in economics and finance :(
At 6:49 PM, Y said…
Super post and great analysis. R u working in the steel sector or do you track it as a hobby or did this deal made you do the research? This is what I am supposed to do in my work and I fail miserably. You are very good and the post was very enlightning. I am going to have a word with our steel sector tracking Industry Analyst tommorow definitely, and make him aware of my newly found prowesses.
At 9:09 PM, greensatya said…
Raj - Actually this article I written for desicritic but thought of putting it in my blog as well.
Mowgli - You do realise that how much effort I had to put my personal bias aside while writing this post. I am indifferent on the 'Indian' connection with this deal.
Freeze - No problem and once you are out of college,I guess you can develop your interests.
Sher - Thanks. The answers to your question would be Yes, No, Yes. Glad that you liked the post :)
At 6:37 AM, Y said…
Satya, my colleague here mentions that this deal if it goes thru will give them a share of 10% of the market which is not enuf to control the prices. But he says the bigger impact will be faced by miners like Rio Tinto etc. Because Mittal Steel is known for its cost advantage and its backward integration. He also said that the combined entity will have a greater access to mines in Africa. So in his opinion the deal has greater ramifications for miners, etc and it will have them squeeze more out of the value chain rather than helping them control the prices in the slump in the market now. Of course it would be a good thing in an upward spiral of prices. What are your views on this ? And why are the prices of steel on a low?
At 8:11 AM, greensatya said…
Sher - that's true. There is no idea of a cartel here. But the mines of Arcelor are significant. It will give the new entity edge over Chinese manufacturers. Secondly the operating cost will be less as you said.
The steel market was never kind of 'make to stock' market. Demand is always less than the supply here and customers get into contract with manufacturers. With the size of new entity, ofcourse cartel is not possible but the bargaining power will definitely be with it.
Price Slump - The price in recent years was reflective of demand and supply Gap. The chinese total production capacity which was earlier 10% of world level has now become 25%(last year China briefly even exported the steel). Consequently the price of steel in China is less than other markets, say North America. 600$ ton was a spike which later got stabilised and hence the prices came down, but this is not indicative of price slump or such.
I don't even say that one day Chinese steel will flood the market like Chinese textiles. It will raise a political hue and cry if not anything else.
At 8:21 AM, Y said…
Satya, am sorry if i am troubling you. But could you relate your following comments:
//the steel industry has traditionally been a seller-driven market//
&
//The steel market was never kind of 'make to stock' market. Demand is always less than the supply here and customers get into contract with manufacturers
//
&
//
The price in recent years was reflective of demand and supply Gap
//
So are you saying that the supply usually outstrips demand. And in that case its the buyers who set the prices, therfore prices being low. So due to chinese demand there was a sudden spike in prices. I am a little confused with regards to the price discovery in the steel market.
At 8:27 AM, greensatya said…
Oops, I made a blunder and didn't realise it.
No no you are not troubling me. The line in my earlier comment would have been
The steel market was never kind of 'make to stock' market. Demand is always MORE than the supply here and customers get into contract with manufacturers.
(had just opened my eyes from sleep and then typed the comment. no excuse, it was my fault:D)
At 8:29 AM, greensatya said…
And one more errata :-
The price still is reflective of demand and supply gap (though the rush has become stable a bit now)
At 8:53 AM, Y said…
So just to summarise:
1)Demand is more than supply, so its a sellers market.
2) There has been a recent spurt in Chinese production, which is causing the steel prices to go down. In other words suppliers are loosing their influence.
3) Mittal is in one way trying to balance this imbalance.
Am I right?
At 9:03 AM, greensatya said…
You are correct, I will just refine them a bit.
1. Yes
2There has been a recent spurt in Chinese production, which is causing the steel prices to go down. In other words suppliers are loosing their influence. - The former does not leads to latter. Supplier losing their influence is has more strong meaning. The price has decreased a bit, much like a correction, sellers still have influence.
3Mittal is in one way trying to balance this imbalance. - Mittal is trying to have competitive advantage if this situation occurs.
At 9:11 AM, Y said…
Thanks a lot Satya, that was good stuff. Looking forward to more such posts from you.
At 9:19 AM, greensatya said…
Welcome and thanks, Sher. Much more than the post, it was the discussion we had through comments which made it meaningful.
At 12:14 PM, Y said…
Satya, u r profile pic?? what happened to that? Hope u will put a new one soon.
At 2:13 PM, greensatya said…
I was looking childish in that pic so I took it down. hehe
It is good idea not to have pic, may be I can get 'some' benefit of doubt. :p
Post a Comment
<< Home